Turkish carriers suffer drop in yield: TAA | Analysis | Airfinance Journal

Turkish carriers suffer drop in yield: TAA

Export:

Turkey’s political turmoil is taking its toll on the country’s two largest carriers, Turkish Airlines (THY) and Pegasus Airlines. Both companies feature in the list of the 10 most deteriorated airlines over the past 12 months provided by Airfinance Journal’s Financial Ratings (TAA).

THY has slipped by 1.2 points, earning a rating of “B” for the third quarter of 2016, while Pegasus Airlines has dropped by 2.5 points – the biggest fall of any of the 180 airlines covered by the service – receiving a rating of “B-”.

The ratings drop can largely be attributed to the spike in geopolitical risk that the country has endured since 2015. In September 2016, rating agency Moody’s cited the airline’s operating environment as a reason for downgrading THY’s corporate family rating to "Ba3" from "Ba2", with a negative outlook.

The impact of the geopolitical risk is twofold. Passenger revenues are down because tourists are less keen to travel to Turkey, while the airlines’ deteriorating balance sheets and the country’s political uncertainty have driven up financing costs. To make matters worse, the devaluation of the Turkish lira is driving up the relative price of the airlines’ dollar-denominated costs.

Falling margins, rising costs

As the data shows, Turkey’s two largest airlines suffered from declining yields and higher debt-to-earnings ratios last year.

THY’s total revenues fell 6% to $7.6 billion for the first nine months of 2016, compared with the same period in 2015, mainly down to declining passenger yields. Meanwhile, total operating costs for the same period rose 2.7% to $7.4 billion.

Its EBITDAR margins (earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, amortization and rent costs) have also taken a hit (see graph). For the third quarter of 2016, the last quarter for which financial results are available, THY’s EBITDAR margin was 21.5%, compared to 31.3% in the third quarter of 2015.

Meanwhile THY’s adjusted net debt to EBITDAR ratio at the end of the third quarter had risen to 4.7x, compared to 2.3x in the third quarter of 2015.

Pegasus Airlines’ EBITDAR margins are also down. For the third quarter of 2016, its EBITDAR margins fell to 32.7% from 35.3% in the third quarter of 2015.

Although total operating costs fell 1.2% to $908 million, total revenues also fell by 4.3% to $974 million.

Pegasus’ own adjusted net debt to EBITDAR ratio at the end of the third quarter had risen to 3.0x from 2.3x in the third quarter of 2015.

 

Source: The Airline Analyst

 

Financing and capacity

Naturally, both airlines have found it more difficult to finance their incoming aircraft, at least at the same rates as in 2015.

Pegasus Airlines recently admitted that it is paying higher financing costs than in the recent past.

“Is there a reflection in our cost of funding? Yes, for the time being,” said the carrier’s VP finance and strategic planning, Tamer Yuzuak, at Airfinance Journal’s 14th Annual Middle East Conference in Dubai last year.

Banking sources tell Airfinance Journal that THY has attempted to close a capital markets structure in the past few months, but was prevented from doing so when some investors withdrew due to their interpretation of the political risk. The airline is now seeking alternative sources of finance, such as Korean institutional investment, but it has not disclosed whether deals have closed successfully or at what price.

Meanwhile, the fall in passenger demand has forced the airlines to reassess their capacity plans.

Before the wave of terrorist attacks, both airlines were expecting traffic growth above the global average, due to Turkey’s proximity to both Europe and the Middle East.  

The fall in passenger demand came at a particularly bad time for THY. With ambitious expansion plans, the carrier had placed a large number of orders with Boeing and Airbus: as of September 2016, its order book stood at 174 aircraft.

However, when demand for travel fell, the carrier was left with excess capacity. In response it organised a massive restructuring with the two manufacturers. In October 2016, it announced the redelivery dates of 167 narrowbody aircraft that were originally scheduled between 2018 and 2022.

The airline is also reportedly seeking to sub-lease three A330s to Russian charter specialist Nordwind Airlines.

However, Pegasus Airlines has chosen not to defer its orders with Airbus. Speaking on an airline panel at the 19th Annual Global Airfinance Conference in Dublin, Serhan Ulga said: “We have 100 Airbus orders, and have received nine aircraft so far. We have not deferred any of our Airbus orders - instead we trying to advance them. We were the first airline to fly the CFM-powered Neo. In this rising fuel environment we thought it would be a good idea to have them as soon as possible.”

 

 

 

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Phasellus ultrices urna eu consequat pulvinar. Suspendisse malesuada scelerisque iaculis. Cras ut facilisis arcu, posuere efficitur nisi. Fusce dictum tortor ac nibh rhoncus auctor. Praesent nunc felis, elementum vel orci quis, sodales tincidunt nisi. Vestibulum vestibulum vel erat quis feugiat. Nam nec pulvinar velit. Nunc feugiat felis lacus, non condimentum urna interdum vitae. In laoreet hendrerit commodo. Sed diam arcu, tincidunt quis augue ac, venenatis consequat dui. Quisque maximus venenatis erat, sed malesuada quam malesuada at. Aenean non quam a ex vulputate laoreet. Praesent eget neque convallis, rhoncus lorem a, venenatis metus. Maecenas sed malesuada purus.

Integer vel neque vel odio tempor laoreet. Praesent vel malesuada dolor, sit amet aliquam augue. Cras magna tortor, ullamcorper nec tristique ac, accumsan quis metus. Integer in magna sit amet leo vulputate vulputate. In pretium quam libero. Cras a pulvinar arcu, et rutrum orci. Proin euismod, justo quis scelerisque porttitor, purus odio dignissim ex, eu rhoncus lorem dolor sit amet mi. Pellentesque in massa vel mauris tempus euismod. Aenean efficitur vestibulum arcu ut elementum. Nam rhoncus ligula vel enim iaculis, quis luctus dui interdum. Nulla erat mi, lacinia eu orci ut, hendrerit fermentum lorem. Sed non gravida quam. Pellentesque habitant morbi tristique senectus et netus et malesuada fames ac turpis egestas. Nulla bibendum erat odio, pharetra lobortis eros blandit a.

In et ultrices ante. Vestibulum consequat libero quis quam tempor, efficitur accumsan lacus sollicitudin. Class aptent taciti sociosqu ad litora torquent per conubia nostra, per inceptos himenaeos. Phasellus ac est lacus. Quisque in interdum urna, non pulvinar sem. Duis tristique tortor vel urna commodo tincidunt sit amet ut sem. In sapien turpis, porta vitae neque in, varius egestas erat.

Interdum et malesuada fames ac ante ipsum primis in faucibus. Donec quis est vel ante facilisis efficitur. Pellentesque tincidunt odio eget lacinia vestibulum. Aliquam erat volutpat. Ut ac ipsum non nisi convallis eleifend et ornare lectus. Pellentesque diam nulla, dapibus quis convallis sed, posuere at urna. Proin tincidunt tincidunt nibh, id molestie est. Integer iaculis, leo sit amet pulvinar pellentesque, tellus elit vehicula ipsum, eget vulputate dui tortor vitae sem. Proin rhoncus venenatis tellus, vitae blandit ipsum malesuada sed. Morbi gravida magna hendrerit faucibus imperdiet. Ut bibendum a massa at efficitur. Donec egestas urna urna, sit amet mattis erat fringilla sit amet. Integer scelerisque enim sed odio semper molestie. Sed tincidunt malesuada nulla a fringilla. Nullam suscipit, justo nec facilisis efficitur, arcu mauris finibus lorem, ut egestas mi purus nec neque. Nunc nec euismod est, ac egestas neque.

Vivamus sit amet pretium quam, vitae fringilla dolor. In nec ligula arcu. Fusce a tortor leo. Sed blandit leo quis turpis sodales, eget tincidunt tortor ultrices. Fusce scelerisque eros quis quam vestibulum tempus. Praesent sodales aliquam nibh vel fermentum. Quisque vel diam sit amet sem convallis interdum. Proin ac velit molestie, malesuada tellus vitae, tempus est. Sed facilisis ut enim ac pretium. Mauris scelerisque fermentum risus, nec ultricies enim finibus vel. Aenean sem enim, dictum mollis aliquet nec, consequat nec nisl. Duis aliquam a lectus vitae ornare.


Regional Snapshot

Related Data

Transaction Snapshot
Air Company | Bond issue | 01-24 | $1.5bn
Financial Close:
11/02/2024
SPV:
Some Aviation Trust
Value:
$1,500.00m USD
Full Details